|
Tuesday, September 17, 2013
News from Make Us Holy!
Monday, September 16, 2013
The Semiotic and the Symbolic
My wife studied literature for her undergraduate and masters
degrees. One of the concepts she studied in feminist literature was the transference
of language from semiotic to symbolic. I’m sure I didn’t understand all of it
but what I picked up I will loosely describe here.
Semiotic language is that which has not yet achieved symbolic associations. Or put more organically, semiotic language speaks from a “gut” level and doesn’t always communicate well with those who are used to only communicating from a symbolic level.
Let me try and explain this with an illustration. If we hear
someone with a sore throat use the term, “I have a frog in my throat” to
explain their ailment, none of us hears or in any way understands that there is
a green amphibious creature stuck in their throat! It is absurd! Why? Because
that expression (and who knows where or when that term actually came about) –
at one time expressed as a semiotic statement – has now achieved symbolic
representation. We “know” that the person using the term is expressing the fact
that they have a scratchy, sore throat.
I have come to believe that many of our spiritual experiences first begin in a semiotic state and eventually attain the symbolic.
So what?
Well, I think it helps to explain why spiritual movements
first catch on and grow and then burn out.
There are many spiritual movements we could examine but, for the moment, let me look at my own journey from semiotic to symbolic in contemporary worship.
I was born in 1955 and grew up in the 60’s and early 70’s. I
enjoyed music but my exposure music was largely religious music, classical
music and folk, pop/rock music. As I went through my high school years my
musical influences were, Gordon Lightfoot, Crosby, Stills, Nash and Young,
Bruce Cockburn, Elton John, David Gates and Bread, Beatles. I leaned towards
more easy-listening, folk/soft rock sounds.
But church music was always piano and organ playing hymns
with a song conductor and/or a choir. When I was in church I understood the
music because it was symbolic of what I understood church to be about. And it
leaned more towards the classical – seldom, if ever, the contemporary.
I remember being interviewed by CBC Televsion (Canadian Broadcasting
Corporation) in 1980. Myself and two friends, Don Wilkinson and Derek Shettler
had begun a radio program called “Fresh Rain” on the University of Manitoba FM Radio
Station back in January of 1977. We played Contemporary Christian Music –
mainly folk/pop/soft rock tunes that expressed a Christian themed message. I
loved the music and it resonated with me. It was the kind of music I loved
coupled with a message that I also loved.
Well, we began to have a significant following in Winnipeg,
MB (where there were no Christian music stations at the time) and because I had
worked as an on-air technician at CBC Radio, I was contacted about doing a TV
interview with me and my collaborators at the radio station. I will never
forget one of the questions the interviewer asked me. “Do you see a time when
this kind of music will be used during Sunday morning worship services?” And I
answered, quite confidently, that church worship music was something completely
different and that I couldn’t ever envision seeing the two styles combining.
Less than a decade later my world-view was set upside down
when contemporary soft rock based worship music began to be used in the church.
In my experience, it had a way of bypassing my symbolic references of how I
connected with God on a Sunday morning and went straight for the jugular! It
was, in every sense of the word, a semiotic convergence of my Monday to
Saturday preferences with my heart’s desire to worship God on a Sunday morning.
The music wasn’t yet tied up with the symbolic references I
had grown up with and come to expect. It was the music of “the street” that I
loved and listened to but never thought to utilize in extending praise to Jesus
in the context of the gathered community. All my presuppositions were stripped
aside. And the result was that it engaged my heart with the power and the fury
of a hurricane. I was, in every sense of the word, caught up with it and blown
away into an impassioned expression of praise to my Saviour. Heart and head –
both together – expressing awe, wonder, and praise heavenward.
And I wasn’t the only one. In the ensuing decade, everywhere
our worship band played, a similar response was experienced my many people –
encountering God outside the symbolic norm – a semiotic encounter of worship.
By and large, that’s no longer true today. Contemporary
worship songs are the norm in a significant majority of churches around North
America. And people obviously enjoy it because it keeps growing and the worship
music keeps getting written, recorded, performed and sold. Seldom is there a
semiotic response to the music. Why? Because it has achieved the lofted place
of symbol. People aren’t caught by surprise by the “from the gut” vocabulary
and expressions – because we now expect that. We symbolically associate church worship
music with those things. And because they are expected we tend toward acknowledgment
rather than passion.
So, do we invent new forms and formats to get back to the
semiotic?
That would be great if we could do that. But that’s the
mystery of the semiotic. Once it has become accepted language (become symbol)
it can never be returned to what it first was. And we can’t create the
semiotic. It just happens – and when it does, it always seems out of place,
wrong, too different to be taken seriously.
Yet it is something I believe God continues to do around us.
He has done it throughout history and he will do it again and again. What we
need to do is not protect nor destroy the symbolic. We need to recognize that
the symbol is only meant to point to something else. Our worship symbols should
always point us beyond themselves to God. And sometimes, in looking past the
symbol, into the heart of God we will find him responding in a unique – perhaps
even a peculiar – way, inviting us further on our journey with Jesus that we
cannot arrive at without the untried, the uninitiated, the unexplored – the semiotic.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)